Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Raudenbush v. Scholfield et al
as 3:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
George Joseph Raudenbush, III
Defendant:
Derrick Scholfield, Bobby Straughter, Mark Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayers v. Tennessee Department of Corrections, et al.
as 2:2016cv02602
Plaintiff:
Richard Mayers
Defendant:
James M. Holloway, Johnny Fitz , Jeffery Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corey Bennett v. Derrick Scholfield, et al
as 16-5740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY ALAN BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRICK SCHOLFIELD, TDOC Commissioner, TONY PARKER, Assistant Commissioner of Prison Operations, JASON WOODALL, Deputy Commissioner of Operations and others
Rayford v. Scholfield et al
as 1:2016cv00008
Plaintiff:
Ercil K. Rayford
Defendant:
Derrick Scholfield, Candace Wiseman, Toney Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00290
Plaintiff:
Corrie Leonard
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Derrick Scholfield, Bledsoe County Correctional Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marvin Green v. Derrick Scholfield
as 15-5585
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARVIN GREEN
Respondent - Appellee:
DERRICK SCHOLFIELD, Warden
Clifton v. Schofield et al
as 2:2015cv00138
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Clifton
Defendant:
Derrick Scholfield, Jason Woodall, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Scholfield et al
as 3:2015cv00401
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Derrick Scholfield, Tony Parker, Jason Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Schofield
as 2:2015cv00064
Petitioner:
Marvin Green
Respondent:
Derrick Scholfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Callicutt v. Scholfield et al
as 3:2015cv00044
Petitioner:
Kewan Callicutt
Respondent:
Derrick Scholfield and Tennessee Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
