Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Smith, Jr. v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Derrick Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Appellate Operations
as 24-20111
Plaintiff:
Derrick Smith
Defendant:
Appellate Operations and Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Derrick Smith v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 23-3023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
LaCroix et al v. State of Michigan, ct al
as 1:2023cv11137
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. LaCroix, Glenn W. Milhan and Derrick Smith
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Gretchen Whitmer, Eli Savit and others
Smith v. Appellate Operations
as 4:2023cv01953
Plaintiff:
Derrick Smith
Defendant:
Appellate Operations
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. May et al
as 1:2023cv00696
Petitioner:
Derrick Smith
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Smith
as 1:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Derrick Smith
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Charon-Ferrer v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv04031
Plaintiff:
Bladimir Charon-Ferrer
Defendant:
Derrick Smith and Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Smith #267009 et al v. Brock et al
as 1:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Derrick Smith, Chauvez Chavez, J.B. and others
Defendant:
Google LLC, Google Inc, Microsoft LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
