Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Webb v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00218
Defendant:
Avocet Enterprises, Inc., CBS Corporation, Flowserve Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Hayes v. Afton Pumps, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00216
Defendant:
Avocet Enterprises, Inc., Dana Companies LLC, Flowserve Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Janet L. Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Dryfka v. Trane US, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01019
Defendant:
Trane US, Inc., CBS Corporation, Core Furnace Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Candace Dryfka
Cross Defendant:
General Dynamics Corporation and Zurn Industries LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Kirschner et al v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01207
Plaintiff:
Edward Kirschner and Eugenia Kirschner
Defendant:
AERCO International, Inc., American National Insurance Company, American Optical Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. , Georgia-Pacific LLC , Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. , 3M Company, AERCO International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Montesano v. American Optical Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00406
Plaintiff:
Teresa Montesano
Defendant:
American Optical Corporation, Trane US, Inc., Ametek, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Kostal et al v. A. W. Chesterton, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00789
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, General Refractories Company, Trane US, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry J. Kostal and Rosemary Kostal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gold et al v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00276
Plaintiff:
Carl Gold and Denise Gold
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton, Inc., AERCO International, Inc., Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
