Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Graham v. Pippens et al
as 3:2023cv02850
Plaintiff:
Gene Graham
Defendant:
Makisha Pippens, DHA and Laurin Compton
Latimore v. Denver Housing Authority (DHA) of the City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2022cv01979
Plaintiff:
Caroll Latimore
Defendant:
Denver Housing Authority (DHA) of the City and County of Denver, David Nisivoccia, David (I) Nisivoccia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
(PS) Lewis v. Next Move Homeless Services et al
as 2:2022cv00876
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jerome Lewis
Defendant:
Next Move Homeless Services, Sierra Sacramento Valley Medical Society, Wellspace Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Benoit v. DHA Filter, LLC
as 3:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Denis Benoit
Defendant:
DHA Filter, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Fernandez v. DHA Filter LLC
as 3:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
Tony Fernandez
Defendant:
DHA Filter LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Fair Housing Council of Riverside County, Inc. et al v. Group XIII Properties LP et al
as 5:2021cv00941
Defendant:
Group XIII Properties LP, Group XIII Properties, Inc, Swaranjit Nijjar and others
Plaintiff:
James Beasley and Fair Housing Council of Riverside County, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
dhas v. CENTRAL PORTFOLIO CONTROL INC
as 2:2021cv01459
Defendant:
CENTRAL PORTFOLIO CONTROL INC
Plaintiff:
MADHUKAR DHAS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
