Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Burgess v. City of Pulaski/City of Pulaski Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Wayne Burgess
Defendant:
City of Pulaski/City of Pulaski Police Department, Officer Joel Robison, Officer John Dickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robert Ardis v. Darlene Dickey, et al
as 24-10470
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD and others
Dickey v. Stores
as 1:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Terrael Dickey
Defendant:
Stores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dickey v. Courts et al
as 1:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
Terrael Dickey
Defendant:
Courts and Mail Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dickey v. Park Center
as 1:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Terrael Dickey
Defendant:
Park Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dickey v. Courts
as 1:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Terrael Dickey
Defendant:
Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Brown v. Dickey, et al
as 23-1767
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JADEN BROWN
Defendant / Appellant:
SAM DICKEY, individually and as an employee of the Cumberland County Sheriffs Department, DANIEL HASKELL, individually and as an employee of the Cumberland County Sheriffs Department, SAM DICKEY, individually and as an employee of the Cumberland County Sheriff's Department and others
Defendant:
CARRIE BRADY, individually and as an employee of the Cumberland County Sheriffs Department, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, KEVIN J. JOYCE, individually and as Sheriff of Cumberland County and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
