Cases 1 - 10 of 338
Marcus Dixon v. Director, VDOC
as 25-6480
Petitioner:
MARCUS LE'SHAWN DIXON
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Dixon v. Director, Virginia Department of Corrections

as 3:2025cv00214
Petitioner:
Marcus LeShawn Dixon
Respondent:
Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joseph Merlino, III v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6958
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
JOSEPH VINCENT MERLINO, III
Chaz Earp v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6932
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
CHAZ ANTONIO EARP
Justin Wolfe v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6840
Petitioner:
JUSTIN MICHAEL WOLFE
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Brian Strebe v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6662
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
BRIAN DAVID STREBE
George Schuppan v. Beth Cabell
as 24-6329
Petitioner:
GEORGE ZACHARY SCHUPPAN
Respondent:
BETH CABELL, Warden, Sussex II State Prison and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Daniel Jamison v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6132
Plaintiff:
DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, MARK AMONETTE, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, NATARCHA GREGG, M.S.A., RD., State Wide Dietician and others
Charles Massey v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6006
Petitioner:
CHARLES ALBERT MASSEY
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corrections and CHADWICK DOTSON
Markelyn Jones v. Chadwick Dotson

as 23-7082
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARKELYN LAMONTRE JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.