Cases 11 - 20 of 328
Michael McCary v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 24-2767
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LA SHAWN MCCARY
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI
Phillip Rehwald v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 24-2796
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP REHWALD
Ceasar Trice v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 24-2790
Plaintiff:
CEASAR TRICE
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI
Randall Hockett v. Allegheny County District Attorneys Office, et al
as 24-2745
Defendant:
PUBLIC DEFENDER ROBERT FOREMAN, ELLIOT HOWSIE, Public Defenders Director, CHRISTOPHER STONE, Assistant District Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL E. HOCKETT
Todd Robinson v. Superintendent Smithfield SCI, et al
as 24-2579
Plaintiff:
TODD ANTHONY ROBINSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and SUPERINTENDENT SMITHFIELD SCI
In re: Jonathan Jones
as 24-2536
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Petitioner:
In re: JONATHAN PAUL JONES
In re: Todd Robinson
as 24-2404
Petitioner:
In re: TODD ANTHONY ROBINSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ORLANDO L. HARPER and MAUREEN P. KELLY
Daryl Hayden v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 24-2075
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Plaintiff:
DARYL T. HAYDEN
TROUTMAN v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00791
Respondent:
WARDEN DAUPHIN COUNTY PRISON and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Petitioner:
DONALD TROUTMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dwight Hill v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 24-1636
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT M. HILL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
