Cases 41 - 50 of 132
In re: Glue Wilkins
as 20-1748
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Petitioner:
In re: GLUE WILKINS
In re: Harry Beckett
as 20-1207
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SYLVIA H. RAMBO and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Not Yet Classified:
SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI
Petitioner:
In re: HARRY L. BECKETT
William Jenkins v. Superintendent Somerset SCI, et al
as 19-3905
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM S. JENKINS
Shover II v. Clark et al
as 3:2019cv01831
Petitioner:
Richard Paul Shover II
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General Office, Warden Brian S. Clark and District Attorney Dauphin County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shane Holloway v. Superintendent Pine Grove SCI, et al
as 19-2778
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANE HOLLOWAY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT PINE GROVE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Stewart v. Tice et al
as 1:2019cv01294
Respondent:
Eric W Tice, PA Attorney General and District Attorney Dauphin County District Attorney
Petitioner:
Shawn A. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sean Donahue v. Superior Court of Pennsylvania, et al
as 19-1625
Defendant / Appellee:
RYAN H. LYSAGHT, KATIE LYNN ADAM, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN M. DONAHUE
Paul Begnoche, Sr. v. Superintendent Mercer SCI, et al
as 18-1021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL JOSEPH BEGNOCHE, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MERCER SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
Charles Smith v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 18-1003
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, HARRISBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, DENNIS SIMMONS and others
Nominal Respondent:
YVETTE KANE
In re: Lester Eiland
as 17-3750
Petitioner:
In re: LESTER EILAND
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
