Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Ronald Poe v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-3200
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Plaintiff:
RONALD LEE POE
Calvin Lynch v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1972
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. LYNCH
Kevin SouffrantIn re: Kevin Souffrant
as 24-1635
Petitioner:
In re: KEVIN SOUFFRANT
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Kenneth Peralta v. District Attorney Lancaster County, et al
as 24-1535
Plaintiff:
KENNETH PERALTA
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, BRADLEY BOOHER and others
Calvin Lynch v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 23-2861
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN B. LYNCH
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Damien ClagonIn re: Damien Clagon
as 23-2461
Petitioner:
In re: DAMIEN D. CLAGON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDANT MORRIS HOUSER, @SCI BENNER TOWNSHIP, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY, , PA and ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Carrington JosephIn re: Carrington Joseph
as 23-2108
Petitioner:
In re: CARRINGTON K. JOSEPH
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Kevin WilliamsIn re: Kevin Williams
as 23-2007
Petitioner:
In re: KEVIN WILLIAMS, AKA Kirby Stewart
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Stephen Harmer v. Superintendent Fayette SCI, et al
as 23-2080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN M. HARMER
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Yusuf Brown v. District Attorney Lancaster County, et al
as 23-2083
Petitioner / Appellant:
YUSUF R. BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
