Cases 41 - 50 of 55
In re: Angel David Vargas, et al
as 14-1709
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ANGEL DAVID VARGAS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT CRESSON SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Nominal Respondent:
CLERK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Angel Varga
as 13-4565
Petitioner:
In re: ANGEL DAVID VARGAS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
WORTHINGTON v. COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON et al
as 5:2013cv06292
Plaintiff:
HENRY F. WORTHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON , EASTON PA, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Mathis v. Joseph Ryan, et al
as 13-4219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS BRADY MATHIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH M. RYAN, Superintendent, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
David Petko v. Gerry Kent, et al
as 13-3927
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID PETKO
Defendant - Appellee:
GERRY KENT, et al., ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
In re: David Petko
as 13-3743
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID PETKO
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
Christopher Kozo v. Superintendent SCI Mahanoy, et al
as 13-3387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER M. KOZO
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SCI MAHANOY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
In re: Paul Schlueter, III
as 13-2578
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: PAUL GEORGE SCHLUETER, III
Defendant - Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
Sonny Thomas v. John Kerestes, et al
as 12-4348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SONNY L. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN KERESTES, DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Terik William
as 12-4087
Petitioner:
In re: TERIK WILLIAMS, AKA Tyre Smith
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
