Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Cato v. District of Columbia
as 1:2023cv01523
Plaintiff: Avery Cato
Defendant: District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Louisiana et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01714
Plaintiff: State of Louisiana, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: U S Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan
Intervenor Plaintiff: State of California, California Water Resources Control Board, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Taylor v. The State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv03088
Plaintiff: Lamajor Undreaous Taylor
Defendant: The State of Mississippi, Governor Tate Reeves, Lauderdale County of Mississippi and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curcio v. CCS Medical Inc et al
as 3:2023cv01579
Plaintiff: Frederick D Curcio, IV, United States of America, State of California and others
Defendant: CCS Medical Inc, DEGC Enterprises (US) Inc, Highland Capital Management LP and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
State of Missouri v. Biden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-30445
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Missouri, State of Louisiana, Aaron Kheriaty and others
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Vivek H. Murthy, Xavier Becerra and others
Amicus Curiae: Children's Health Defense, Leland Stanford Junior University, Electronic Frontier Foundation and others
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee: Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant: Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor: Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae: State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court: 240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 22-11086
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing business as 80 Percent Arms
Defendant / Appellant: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae: District of Columbia, Brady, 16 Major Cities and others
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 22-11071
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Defendant / Appellant: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae: District of Columbia, Brady, State of New Jersey and others
Troy SmocksIn re: Troy Smocks
as 22-40635
Petitioner: In re: Troy Anthony Smocks
Respondent: United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Fund Texas Choice et al v. Paxton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff: Fund Texas Choice, The North Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant: Ken Paxton, Susan R. Deski, Julie Renken and others
Amicus Curiae: Physicians For Reproductive Health, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?