Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Kirk Jensen v. Unknown Parties #1, et al
as 23-1859
Plaintiff / Appellant: KIRK EDWIN JENSEN
Defendant / Appellee: UNKNOWN PARTIES #1, named as all variations of the person Sheriff's Department, UNKNOWN PARTIES #2, named as a Department of County of St. Joseph D-U-N-S number: 008645009, UNKNOWN PARTIES #3, named as all variations of the person St. Joseph County Court and others
Jensen v. Unknown Parties #1 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00749
Plaintiff: Kirk Edwin Jensen
Defendant: Unknown Parties #1, Unknown Parties #2, Unknown Parties #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jane Doe 1, et al v. William Thornbury, Jr., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-5609
Plaintiff / Appellee: JANE DOE 1, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN MINOR DOE 1, by and through his next friend, Jane Doe 1 and others
Defendant: WILLIAM C. THORNBURY, JR., MD, in his official capacity as the President of the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, et al.
Intervenor: COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY EX REL. ATTORNEY GENERAL DANIEL CAMERON
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Feather-Gorbey v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00995
Plaintiff: Michael S. Feather-Gorbey
Defendant: United States of America, State of Kentucky, Governor and Attorney General, State of Virgina, Governor and Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Owl Feather-Gorbey et al
as 5:2022cv00170
Plaintiff: Chief Col Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant: United States of America, State of Tennessee, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OH, et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 21-4235
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant / Appellee: XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, JESSICA S. MARCELLA, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, in their official capacities, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
State Of Ohio et al v. Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00675
Plaintiff: State Of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Jessica S. Marcella and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Montana, State of New York, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Franklin Smith v. Freddie Burton, Jr., et al
as 21-2879
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee: FREDDIE G. BURTON, JR., Probate Judge, EMMETT SULLIVAN, United States District Court Judge for the District of Columbia, LINDA M. STEELE and others
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Associated Community Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv10174
Defendant: Nikole Gilstorf, Directele, Inc., Amy Burland and others
Plaintiff: Colorado Secretary of State, Oklahoma, State of, North Carolina, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Adams & Boyle, P.C., et al v. Herbert Slatery, III, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5408
Plaintiff / Appellee: ADAMS & BOYLE, P.C., on behalf of itself and its patients, DR. KIMBERLY LOONEY, PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER MEMPHIS REGION and others
Defendant / Appellant: AMY P. WEIRICH, District Attorney General of Shelby County, WILLIAM BYRON LEE, Governor, GLENN R. FUNK, District Attorney General of Nashville and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, ETHICS AND RELIGIOUS LIBERTY COMMISSION OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?