Cases 1 - 5 of 5
PHILPOT v. BROWN, NAFF, PITTS OMNIMEDIA, INC.
as 1:2020cv03089
Plaintiff:
LARRY G PHILPOT and LARRY G. PHILPOT
Defendant:
BROWN NAFF PITTS OMNIMEDIA, INC. DBA DCAGENDA and BROWN, NAFF, PITTS OMNIMEDIA, INC. a District of Columbia company doing business as DCAGENDA
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
United Supreme Council, 33 Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, Prince Hall Affiliation, Southern Jurisdiction of the United States of America et al v. United Supreme Council of the Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite for the 33 De
as 1:2016cv01103
Plaintiff:
United Supreme Council, 33 Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, Prince Hall Affiliation, Southern Jurisdiction of the United States of America and United Supreme Council 33 (Thirty-Three) of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry (Prince Hall Affiliation) Southern Jurisdiction U.S., Grand Orient at Washington, District Of Columbia
Defendant:
United Supreme Council of the Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite for the 33 Degree of Freemasonry, Prince Hall Affiliated, Ralph Slaughter, Joseph A. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
GAINES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv01481
Plaintiff:
ALDOLPHUS R. GAINES
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground, LLC
as 11-17210
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
RIGHTHAVEN LLC
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, a District of Columbia limited-liability company; and DAVID ALLEN
Atkins, Leslie v. Fischer, Benson, et al
as 02-7003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Leslie Atkins, doing business as Leslie Atkins Communications
Defendant - Appellee:
Benson J. Fischer, The Fischer Organization Inc., a District of Columbia corporation and The Fischer Brewing Company, Inc., a District of Columbia corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
