Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 41 - 47 of 47
PORCO et al v. CHIMES INTERNATIONAL LIMITED et al
as 2:2009cv04904
Plaintiff: MARY ANN PORCO and GENNARO PORCO
Defendant: CHIMES INTERNATIONAL LIMITED and CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Type: Torts - Injury None
BERGMAN v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv04264
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant: ABBOTT LABORATORIES
NEVYAS v. ALLERGAN, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00432
Plaintiff: CALIFORNIA, DELAWARE, FLORIDA and others
Defendant: ALLERGAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALLERGAN, INC., ET AL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv05135
Movant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA , THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT , THE STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Defendant: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP , BIOGEN IDEC, INC. , CEPHALON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL BRUCE BOISE ET AL VS CEPHALON, INC.ET AL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00287
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Defendant: CEPHALON, INC. and JOHN DOES#1-100
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Hewlett v. US Parole Commission et al
as 3:2007cv01448
Petitioner: Darrell Hewlett
Respondent: US Parole Commission, District of Columbia, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oliver v. Miner et al
as 3:2007cv01282
Petitioner: Robert E. Oliver
Respondent: Warden Miner, US Parole Com'n, District of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?