Cases filed in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Cato v. District of Columbia
as 1:2023cv01523
Plaintiff: Avery Cato
Defendant: District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VanDerStok et al v. Garland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00691
Plaintiff: Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G Andren, Tactical Machining LLC and others
Defendant: Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach and others
Petitioner: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms
Amicus Curiae: Gun Owners for Safety, Jason Perry, Ryan Busse and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. doing business as 80 Percent Arms, Defense Distributed, Second Amendment Foundation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Curcio v. CCS Medical Inc et al
as 3:2023cv01579
Plaintiff: Frederick D Curcio, IV, United States of America, State of California and others
Defendant: CCS Medical Inc, DEGC Enterprises (US) Inc, Highland Capital Management LP and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Fund Texas Choice et al v. Paxton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff: Fund Texas Choice, The North Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant: Ken Paxton, Susan R. Deski, Julie Renken and others
Amicus Curiae: Physicians For Reproductive Health, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
United States of America v. State of Texas Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00796
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Defendant: State of Texas
Intervenor Defendant: Erick Graham, Jeff Tuley, Mistie Sharp and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Massachusetts, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Petitioner: Felipe Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Braidwood Management Inc. et al. v. Xavier Becerra et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00283
Plaintiff: John Kelley, Kelley Orthodontics, Joel Starnes and others
Defendant: Steven T. Mnuchin, Alex M. Azar II, Eugene Scalia and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Illinois, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Smocks v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00592
Plaintiff: Mr Troy Anthony Smocks
Defendant: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
NetChoice LLC et al v. Paxton
as 1:2021cv00840
Plaintiff: NetChoice LLC a 501(c)(6) District of Columbia organization doing business as NetChoice and Computer & Communications Industry Association a 501(c)(6) non-stock Virginia Corporation doing business as CCIA
Defendant: Ken Paxton
Amicus Curiae: Chamber of Progress, The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, The American Civil Liberties Union and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Van Allen v. Chief Judge of the First Circuit et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00534
Defendant: SCOTUS, Chief Judge of the Eighth Circuit, Chief Judge of the Seventh Circuit and others
Plaintiff: Harold William Van Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson et al v. Department of Criminal Justice-Parole Divsion, Pamela Thelke et al
as 4:2019cv02939
Respondent: Persons under Color as U.S. District Judges and Clerks, Deputy Clerks, District Courts, Austin and Waco Divisions, U.S. District and Appeals Courts, District of Columbia per persons misrepresenators of Judges, Clerks, and deputy clerks, Department of Criminal Justice-Parole Divsion, Pamela Thelke and others
Petitioner: Samuel James Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?