Cases 1 - 10 of 214
Sarah Cordle v. Enovis Corporation, et al
as 24-5958
Defendant:
COLFAX CORPORATION, DJO GLOBAL, INC., DJO, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SARAH CORDLE, by and through her Next Friend Dorothy Cordle
Probasco v. Encore Medical, LP et al
as 4:2024cv04062
Defendant:
DJ Orthopedics, LLC, Encore Medical, LP a Delaware Corporation doing business as Encore Orthopedics, DJO, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Craig G. Probasco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Therabody, Inc. v. DJO, LLC et al

as 2:2021cv09327
Plaintiff:
Therabody, Inc.
Defendant:
DJO, LLC, DJO, LLC a Delaware LLC doing business as Compex and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Richardson v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 6:2021cv06310
Plaintiff:
Judy Richardson
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc., DJO, LLC, Encore Medical, LP dba DJO Surgical and others
BLACKSHEAR v. BIOMET INC. et al
as 3:2020cv14406
Defendant:
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC, DJO, LLC, BIOMET INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BLACKSHEAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DJO, LLC v. Dr Medical, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01507
Defendant:
Medselect, Corporation, Dr Medical, LLC, Medselect, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DJO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graves v. DJO, LLC et al

as 3:2020cv01103
Defendant:
DJO, LLC and Does 1 through 30
Plaintiff:
Marie Graves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Feagin v. Biomet Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00700
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Aesculap Implants Systems LLC, Biomet Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Feagin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Bird v. DJO LLC
as 20-15597
Defendant / Appellant:
DJO LLC, A Delaware limited liability company
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL BIRD
Gregoire v. Biomet, Inc. et al

as 3:2020cv00077
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics, LLC, Biomet, Inc., Encore Medical, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Gregoire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.