Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Keith Thomas v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 22-11661
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a.k.a. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LLP a.k.a. Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP a.k.a. Bank of America Corp., RUBIN LUBLIN, LLC, MCGUIRE WOODS, LLP and others
Thomas v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
Keith Thomas
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and DLJ Mortgage Capital Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1982 Discrimination re property rights (housing)
Hoyos v. DLJ Mortgage Capital Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv00546
Plaintiff:
Selena Hoyos
Defendant:
Orange County Sheriff Department, Any and All Currently Undislosed Parties Involved in the Illegal Action, Leslie Rushing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00767
Plaintiff:
Lisa Wells and Foree Wells, III
Defendant:
DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mass et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv07202
Plaintiff:
Alan Mass and Arlene Mass
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., CSMC Mortgage-Backed Trust 2007-2, U.S. Bank National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gadaleta v. Houser Auctioneers et al
as 4:2013cv01989
Plaintiff:
Patricia Gadaleta
Defendant:
Houser Auctioneers, Jason Houser, DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Scott v. US Bank NA
as 12-1365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
US BANK NA, MERS CORPORATION, INC, f/k/a Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc, DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC and others
Scott v. US Bank, NA et al
as 2:2009cv00516
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Scott
Defendant:
US Bank, NA, MERS Corporation, Inc., DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
