Cases 31 - 40 of 82
Leatherwood v. Whetsel, et al
as 13-6073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. LEATHERWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN WHETSEL, Sheriff, DAVID PRATER, District Attorney, GAYLAND GIEGER, Assistant DA and others
Marshall v. Lee, et al
as 13-6062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY G. MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES LEE, Correctional Officer, A. ARMSTRONG, Sergeant, TRACY ELLIS, Case Mgr. and others
Hooper v. Jones, et al
as 13-6048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD HOOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, RANDALL WORKMAN, Warden and DOES, Unknown Executioners
Amin v. Clements, et al
as 13-1043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDULLAH KRU AMIN
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director DOC, STEVE HARTLEY, Warden, A.V.C.F., WILLIAM MANUEL GOMEZ, A.V.C.F. Disciplinary Chairman and others
Thomas v. Jone
as 13-5012
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID R. THOMAS
Respondent - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC
Gomez v. Davis, et al
as 13-1004
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETER E. GOMEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN DAVIS, B.V.M.C., TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director DOC and JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Marshall v. Lee, et al
as 12-6257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY GENE MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES LEE, Correctional Officer, A. ARMSTRONG, Sergeant, TRACY ELLIS, Case Manager and others
Webb v. Jones, et al
as 12-6250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER W. WEBB
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, AMANDA WEAVER, Case Mgr and JONES, Unit Mgr
Berryhill v. Workman, et al
as 12-6211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, LINDA MORGAN, Deputy Warden, ART LIGHTLE, Deputy Warden and others
Hooper v. Jones, et al
as 12-6202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD HOOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden and DOES, Unknown Executioners
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
