Cases 51 - 60 of 82
Williams v. Jones, et al
as 12-6002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS N. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, DON SUTTMILLER, Chief Medical Administrator, GENESE MCCOY, Medical Services Administrator and others
Morales v. Jones, et al
as 11-5155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMAR MORALES
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director, WALTER DINWIDDIE, Warden, CURTIS HOOD, Chief of Security and others
Morris v. Lawton Correctional Facility, et al
as 11-6296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
LAWTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DAVID MILLER, Warden, POLIGHTES, Case Manager and others
Stephens v. Jones, et al
as 11-6284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MARK STEPHENS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director, DOC, GENESE MCCOY, Medical Services Administrator, DONNA LAYMON, Warden and others
Church v. Oklahoma Corr. Industries, et al
as 11-6272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM L.A. CHURCH
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES, OKLAHOMA CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES SERVICES, CELL FOR and others
Farris v. Jones, et al
as 11-6260
Petitioner - Appellant:
TYRONE L FARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Dopp v. Jones, et al
as 11-6207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD LYNN DOPP
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, JOHNNY BLEVINS, IA Administrator, RANDY KNIGHT, IA Officer and others
Pemberton v. Jones, et al
as 11-6138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CURTIS PEMBERTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, JAMES RUDEK, Warden, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Clayton v. Jone
as 11-7000
Petitioner - Appellee:
JAMES EDWARD CLAYTON
Respondent - Appellant:
JUSTIN JONES, DOC Director
Burnett v. Jones, et al
as 10-6285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN CRAIG BURNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBBIE MORTON, Administrative Review Authority, JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, JOSEPH TAYLOR, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
