Cases 1 - 10 of 3,194
Donald Higgs v. New Jersey Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1712
Plaintiff:
DONALD D. HIGGS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VICTORIA L. KUHN, Esq., NJ DOC Commissioner, M. CHERY, Corrections Officer and others
Henry v. Paige et al
as 7:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Henry
Defendant:
Treandre D. Paige, VA DOC Department of Correction, Wallens Ridge State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguilar v. County of Pima, et al.
as 24-2440
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL AGUILAR
Defendant:
COUNTY OF PIMA, CHRIS NANOS, STEPHEN PERKO, per Answer at Doc. 39 and others
TICE v. WILSON et al.
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT TICE
Defendant:
HARRY E. WILSON, PA STATE POLICE, MEGAN'S LAW SECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tehrani v. Doc Maintenance, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Dadkhah Tehrani
Defendant:
Doc Maintenance, Inc., Amigo Mobility International, Inc. and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Carter v. Stubbs et al
as 1:2024mc00192
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Calli A. Stubbs and DOC Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Vaughan v. Burnice Mace
as 24-6317
Plaintiff:
DONALD DOC VAUGHAN
Defendant:
BURNICE MACE, RN, BSN, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, in whole capacity, CORIZON HEALTH and others
MELENDEZ v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv00683
Petitioner:
GARY MELENDEZ
Respondent:
DR. LAUREL R. HARRY, PA DOC Secretary, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cunningham v. Lupis
as 24-844
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. CUNNINGHAM, SR.
Defendant:
FRANCESCO LUPIS, Dr., COLLEEN GALLAGHER, RUDY ALVAREZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
