Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Lin v. Wray et al
as 3:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Ke-Wei Lin
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, DOJ, Chad Yarbrough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McKellop v. Warden of FMC Fort Worth
as 4:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Jeffrey McKellop
Respondent:
DOJ, Thomas A. Dibiase, Matthew Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of North Carolina, State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Leal v. XNXX.gov/Owner/United States Government, et al.
as 5:2023cv01477
Plaintiff:
Adam Matthew Leal
Defendant:
XNXX.gov/Owner/United States Government, FBI, CIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. Warden Garrett et al
as 4:2023cv03481
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mobley
Defendant:
Warden Garrett, Mrs. Nichols, Dept. of Justice-DOJ Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Contreras v. Wilson et al
as 4:2022cv04102
Plaintiff:
Adam Contreras
Defendant:
David Wilson, Melissa Wilson, Fox 26 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Davis v. BOP et al
as 3:2022cv02395
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wayne Davis
Defendant:
BOP, DOJ and Seagoville FCI Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newberry v. Department of Justice (DOJ)
as 3:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Phillip Newberry
Defendant:
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States (DOJ) v. $46,120
as 3:2022cv01658
Plaintiff:
United States (DOJ) and United States of America
Defendant:
$46,120
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
