Cases 1 - 10 of 563
Stoute v. City of Chelsea et al
as 1:2024cv11370
Defendant:
Mass DOT and City of Chelsea
Plaintiff:
Stephen Stoute
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Primack v. Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02260
Defendant:
Colorado Rockies Baseball Club, Ltd., Aramark Food and Support Services Group, Inc., Aramark Sports and Entertainment Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRETT PRIMACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ortiz et al v. Dot Foods Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv06148
Plaintiff:
Emmy Zapata Vallejo and Juan P. Ortiz
Defendant:
Dot Foods Inc., Benjamin Santiago Roldan and Gabriel Jameer Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Jeddah et al
as 2:2024cv06750
Defendant:
Christ Episcopal School, Bellaire Fitness Center, Tucker Transmissions and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Reid (Walker)
as 24-2030
Defendant:
Casanova, ISAIAH SANTOS, Beagle and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mitchell v. City of Burleson TX Municipality Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01894
Defendant:
B Cordell, Terres Poer, Autumn Keefer and others
Plaintiff:
Danny R Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06017
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Davis (Young)
as 24-1913
Defendant:
ARDAE HINES, CHRISTOPHER DAVIS, WILLIAM FENNELL and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Floy (Lockhart)
as 24-1904
Defendant:
JAHAZ LANGSTON, JAUWAN EDWARDS, SHAKALE BRANTLEY and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
