Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Deanna Robinson v. US
as 23-1715
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEANNA ROBINSON
Plaintiff: CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT, GLENDA CODY and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Audrey Lessner v. US
as 23-1507
Plaintiff: CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT, GLENDA CODY and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE, OCERINE COOPER and others
Not Yet Classified: AUDREY LESSNER
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Connie Ford v. US
as 23-1508
Plaintiff / Appellant: CONNIE FORD
Plaintiff: CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT, GLENDA CODY and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Timothy Olmos v. Michael Cimino, et al
as 23-15685
Plaintiff / Appellant: TIMOTHY PAUL OLMOS, named as Timothy Olmos
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL CIMINO, named as Chief Probation Officer, Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, ERWINN PRIETO, Probation Officer, Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, originally named as Edwin Prieto, changed per [9], ARMIDA HERNANDEZ, Surveillance Officer, Maricopa County Adult Probation Department and others
Barbara Mast v. US
as 23-1285
Plaintiff / Appellant: BARBARA MAST
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Latasha Woolridge v. US
as 23-1286
Plaintiff / Appellant: LATASHA WOOLRIDGE
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Teresa Goin v. US
as 23-1283
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERESA GOIN
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Laurie Reynolds v. US
as 23-1287
Plaintiff / Appellant: LAURIE REYNOLDS
Plaintiff: CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT, GLENDA CODY and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Gerri Hood v. US
as 23-1284
Plaintiff / Appellant: GERRI F. HOOD
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Keshia Holliman v. US
as 23-1265
Plaintiff / Appellant: KESHIA HOLLIMAN, a/k/a Keshia Horton
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?