Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Close v. Ivy Medical et al
as 4:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Brynn Marie Close
Defendant:
Ivy Medical, TFCJ, Doug Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cai, et al. v. Eargo, Inc., et al.
as 23-3470
Plaintiff / Appellant:
XIAOBIN CAI and IBEW LOCAL 353 PENSION PLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
EARGO, INC., CHRISTIAN GORMSEN, ADAM LAPONIS and others
IBEW Local 353 Pension Plan v. Eargo, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv08747
Plaintiff:
IBEW Local 353 Pension Plan
Defendant:
Eargo, Inc., Christian Gormsen, Adam Laponis and others
Petitioner:
Xiaobin Cai
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
PATEL et al v. AKBRUDIN
as 7:2019cv00188
Defendant:
DAVIS HARRIS, CHARLES M WALKER, VISHNU SUTARIA and others
Not Classified By Court:
NARENDRA MODI and EVA M LAMEH
Plaintiff:
KRISHNA PATEL and VIJAY PATEL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Butkowski v. Kenny et al
as 2:2014cv00229
Plaintiff:
Jason Butkowski
Defendant:
Michael E Kenny, Doug Hughes, Rob Morse and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Owen v. Lippincott
as 5:2012cv04878
Plaintiff:
Victor H. Owen, III
Defendant:
Doug Hugh Lippincott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Flieger v. City of Twin Falls et al
as 1:2010cv00152
Plaintiff:
Phillip Duane Flieger
Defendant:
City of Twin Falls, Twin Falls County Jail, Twin Falls County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Carter et al
as 1:2009cv00300
Plaintiff:
Calvin Ray Knight
Defendant:
Tom Carter and Doug Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Carter et al
as 1:2009cv00268
Plaintiff:
Calvin Knight
Defendant:
Tom Carter and Doug Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
