Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Spradling v. Bowers et al
as 2:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
Zackeory T. Spradling
Defendant:
CO Aaron Bowers, CO Garren Rowe, Captain Pennick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holbrook v. Sandy et al
as 2:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Tex Gene Holbrook, II
Defendant:
Jeff Sandy, Betsy Jividen, Donnie Ames and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramsey v. Wilson et al
as 2:2021cv00497
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ramsey
Defendant:
Sgt. John Wilson and Cpl. Dylan Hayhurst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Cosner v. Dr. Thistlethwaite
as 21-7250
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD L. COSNER
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. THISTLETHWAITE, JOSHUA SHREWSBERY, SANDRA MAY and others
Defendant:
PSIMED, INC., WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and MOUNT OLIVE CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX
Sopko v. White et al
as 2:2021cv00445
Plaintiff:
Steven Paul Sopko
Defendant:
Lt. Franklin Dale White, Lt. Andrew Hill, COIII Dylan Hayhurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitzpatrick v. Hayhurst et al
as 2:2021cv00438
Plaintiff:
Brandon Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Dylan Hayhurst and Correctional Officer Tre'Shaun McDowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wale v. Hayhurst et al
as 2:2020cv00713
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Captain Brian Penick and Correctional Officer Dylan Hayhurst
Plaintiff:
Paul Wale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marcum v. Hayhurst
as 2:2020cv00381
Plaintiff:
Jeremy A. Marcum
Defendant:
Dylan Hayhurst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Greene v. David Ballard
as 20-6454
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH COOPER, Psy. Dr./MHU Staff, SHANNON COLEMAN, MHU Staff, KEN BOWLIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JERMAINE GREENE
Greene v. Slack et al
as 2:2018cv00469
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Greene
Defendant:
Donald Slack, Dustin Rose, John Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
