Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 679
Dahl v. USA
as 3:2024cv03090
Petitioner: Adam Dahl
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dahl v. Syngenta Crop LLC et al
as 3:2024pq01067
Special Master: Randi Ellis
Plaintiff: Jack Dahl
Defendant: Syngenta Crop LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Assad v. Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff: George Assad
Defendant: Scott W.H. Seu, Thomas B. Fargo, Peggy Y. Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
R. v. Dahl
as 6:2024cv00586
Plaintiff: S. R.
Defendant: Joel Dahl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Type: Contract Insurance
Wensley-Garcia v. Mountbatten et al
as 3:2024cv01899
Plaintiff: Colleen Marie Wensley-Garcia, Tracy Dunn and Grace Victoria Mountbatten
Defendant: Charles Mountbatten, Fiona Irinka Strauss, Lavaughn Irene Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pelosi-Dahl v. Johnson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff: Zachary V. Pelosi-Dahl
Defendant: Julie Crews Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dahl v. Petroplex Acidizing
as 24-2038
Plaintiff: DARVIN DAHL, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Defendant: PETROPLEX ACIDIZING, INC.
Pelosi-Dahl v. Rhoden et al
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff: Zachary V. Pelosi-Dahl
Defendant: Scotty Rhoden, Julie C. Johnson, Brian S. Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tai v. Seu et al
as 3:2024cv01198
Plaintiff: Alexander Tai
Defendant: Scott W. H. Seu, Thomas B. Fargo, Celeste A. Connors and others
Petroplex Acidizing v. Dahl
as 24-701
Petitioner: PETROPLEX ACIDIZING, INC.
Respondent: DARVIN DAHL, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?