Cases 1 - 10 of 158
Smith, Shannon v. Emmerich, E.
as 3:2025cv00296
Petitioner:
Shannon Dale Smith
Respondent:
E. Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Chevron USA Inc et al
as 2:2025cv00433
Plaintiff:
Dale Smith
Defendant:
Chevron USA, Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP, Chamberlin Distributing Company Inc doing business as Chamberlin Agriculture and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Soto v. State of Texas
as 25-10361
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Margarito Soto
Defendant:
State of Texas, Sharon Wilson, Dale Smith, Also known as Dale Dominick Smith and others
Smith v. Warden, TDCJ Robertson Unit
as 1:2024cv00202
Petitioner:
Larry Dale Smith
Respondent:
Warden, TDCJ Robertson Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Soto v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Margarito Soto
Defendant:
John Williams Stickles, John Stickles, State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Gordon et al
as 0:2024cv02714
Defendant:
Andrew Gordon
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Dale Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Tallant et al
as 4:2024cv04073
Defendant:
Jailer Jodan Niel, Jailer Landon Tollette and Jail Administrator Jana Tallant
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Dale Smith, Jr and Curtis Wayne Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Rodney Smith
as 24-2359
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rodney Dale Smith
Smith v. Gordon et al
as 1:2024cv05042
Defendant:
Andrew Gordon
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Dale Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. McClean et al
as 4:2024cv04051
Defendant:
Jana Tallant, Does Badge Number 11-6, Todd Tallant and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Dale Smith, Jr. and Curtis Wayne Smith, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
