Cases 1 - 10 of 12
FORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15511
Plaintiff:
DALE FORD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company v. Baker
as 22-2616
Petitioner:
E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company
Respondent:
Michele Baker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Angela Corbett, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Daniel Schuttig, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
FORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv66361
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY DALE FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ford v. Schmidt et al
as 4:2019cv03775
Defendant:
Unit Classification Committee Members, Counsel substitute Tubbs, J. Looney and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dale Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. McMullen
as 6:2016cv00968
Petitioner:
Ricky Dale Ford
Respondent:
UP McMullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ford v. McMullen CASE TRANSFERRED TO TYLER DIVISION
as 1:2016cv00245
Petitioner:
Ricky Dale Ford
Respondent:
UP McMullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ford v. Sam et al
as 1:2016cv00129
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dale Ford
Defendant:
E Sam, Brad Livingston, Rawn Toddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Ford v. UTMB CEO, et al
as 15-20422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY DALE FORD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH CEO, Officially, DIRECTOR TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE CLIENT PATIENT AFFAIRS, Officially, DIRECTOR OFFENDER POLICY AND PROCEDURE, Officially and others
Ford v. Livingston
as 1:2015cv00225
Petitioner:
Ricky Dale Ford
Respondent:
Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Livingston
as 4:2015cv01237
Petitioner:
Ricky Dale Ford
Respondent:
Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
