Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Hood v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2021cv00458
Petitioner: Rodney Dale Hood
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv56764
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: KYLE DALE HOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodney Hood v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 19-40766
Defendant / Appellee: BRANT COLLIER, Executive Director, OWEN MURRAY, Vice President, KING WARDEN COMSTOCK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RODNEY DALE HOOD
Hood v. Livingston et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00295
Defendant: Brad Livingston, Mark Robert, M.D. Hall and others
Plaintiff: Rodney Dale Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hood v. Livingston et al
as 4:2018cv01028
Plaintiff: Rodney Dale Hood
Defendant: Brad Livingston, Brant Collier, Owen Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Hood v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-20779
Petitioner - Appellant: RODNEY DALE HOOD
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Rodney Hood v. Montgomery County Texas, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-20040
Plaintiff - Appellant: RODNEY DALE HOOD
Defendant - Appellee: MONTGOMERY COUNTY TEXAS, KENNETH G. DAVIS, EDSEL WEST and others
Hood v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv00035
Petitioner: Rodney Dale Hood
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodney Hood v. Robert Sandmann, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-20724
Plaintiff - Appellant: RODNEY DALE HOOD
Defendant - Appellee: ROBERT M. SANDMANN and MARK ROBERTS, Practice Manager
Hood v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2012cv00436
Petitioner: Rodney Dale Hood
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?