Cases 1 - 8 of 8
HUNZIKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35133
Plaintiff:
DAN C HUNZIKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TUCKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv81805
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAN C TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01079
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Tuttle et al v. Kolter Signature Homes of Georgia, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00207
Plaintiff:
Dan C. Tuttle, Jr , Joni H. Tuttle and Dan C. Tuttle, Sr.
Defendant:
Kolter Signature Homes of Georgia, LLC , The Kolter Group, LLC , OK Lake Lanier, LLLP and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Davis v. Batts et al
as 5:2017cv00062
Plaintiff:
Gary Lavon Davis
Defendant:
Jerry L Batts, Gray West and Dan C Totten
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Veteto v. The Justices and Clerks of the, et al
as 11-13843
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD D. VETETO
Defendant - Appellee:
THE JUSTICES AND CLERKS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, in their official and individual capacities, THE JUDGES AND CLERKS OF THE ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS, in their official and individual capacities, THE JUDGES OF THE ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, in their official and individual capacities and others
Veteto v. The Justices and Clerks of the Supreme Court of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00516
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Veteto
Defendant:
The Justices and Clerks of the Supreme Court of Alabama, The Judges and Clerks of the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, The Judges of the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leshore v. King
as 5:2009cv00890
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Leshore
Defendant:
Dan C King, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
