Cases 1 - 10 of 26
McGore #142739 v. Lesatz et al
as 2:2019cv00051
Defendant:
Baraga, County of, Dan Lesatz, Joe Bouchard and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl McGore #142739
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bender #163870 v. Snyder et al
as 2:2019cv00039
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bender #163870
Defendant:
Dan Lesatz, Lincoln Marshall and Keith Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGore #142739 v. Lesatz et al
as 2:2019cv00008
Defendant:
Baraga, County of, Dan Lesatz, Joe Bouchard and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl McGore #142739
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00103
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
McGore #142739 v. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
Darryl McGore #142739
Defendant:
Unknown Snyder, Dan Lesatz and J. Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager & Misconduct Hearings Administrator, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Kinross Complex Store, Jane Doe (Prisoner Store Employees) and others
Rufus Spearman v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN, aka Rufus Lamar Savin Spearman
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of the MDOC, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Grievance Manager & Misconduct Hearings Administrator, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES), named as Kinross Complex Store, Jane Doe (Prisoner Store Employees) and others
Charles Fields v. Dan Lesatz, et al
as 16-2711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAN LESATZ, Deputy Warden, SCOTT SPRADER, Deputy Warden, L. PHILLIPSON, Arus and others
Defendant:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden, ROBIN GILBERT and BRADLEY HAYNIE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
