Cases 1 - 7 of 7
DEJON LAMAR CHRISTOPHER BEY TRUST d/b/a Clark, Dejon Lamar Christopher v. Haaland et al
as 1:2022cv09785
Plaintiff:
DEJON LAMAR CHRISTOPHER BEY TRUST doing business as Clark, Dejon Lamar Christopher
Defendant:
Debra Anne Haaland, Andrew Saul, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walter v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv09414
Plaintiff:
Sanders Walter, II
Defendant:
Antony John Blinken, Janet Louise Yellen, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stepherson v. Haaland et al
as 1:2022cv09202
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Stepherson Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, a Noble a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in Propia Persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae doing business as Jamal El Trust
Defendant:
Debra Anne Haaland doing business as Debra Anne Haaland, Andrew Marshall Saul, Brian Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Parker v. Haaland et al
as 1:2022cv08107
Plaintiff:
Jamal Parker
Defendant:
Debra Anne Haaland, Andrew Saul, Charles Paul Rettig Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. State of Michigan et al
as 9:2021cv00764
Plaintiff:
Antrel Vonique Brown
Defendant:
State of Michigan, State Department of Corrections, Dana Nessel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Eastern District of California et al
as 9:2021cv00709
Defendant:
Clerks, Dancks, Eastern District of California and others
Plaintiff:
Antrel Vonique Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of New York et al v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 1:2021cv00536
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Colorado, State of North Carolina and others
Lead Plaintiff:
State of New York
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor and Al Stewart
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
