Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Danielle Bey v. Centralized Infractions Bureau et al
as 1:2021cv03884
Plaintiff:
Malka Yasmin Danielle Bey
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Centralized Infractions Bureau, Georgia Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Bey v. Rosamond et al
as 4:2021cv00302
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bey
Defendant:
Hon. Brad Cummings, Chris Rosamond and Jim McLeroy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bey v. Rosamond et al
as 3:2021cv00284
Respondent:
Jim McLeroy, Chris Rosamond and Brad Cummings
Petitioner:
Daniel Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maradiaga v. City of New York
as 20-3747
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cosme Del Rosario-Bell, Jeronimo Maradiaga, Randolph Carr and others
Defendant / Appellee:
P.O. Jennifer Gomez, In their individual capacity, P.O. Jack Deng, (Shield No. 8379), in their individual capacity, John Does, New York City Police Department Police Officers (P.O.), 13, (the names John Doe being fictitious, as the true names and shield numbers are not presently known), in their individual capacities and others
Daniels-Bey v. FCI Pekin
as 1:2020cv01225
Plaintiff:
Steven Daniels-Bey
Defendant:
FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bey v. US Department of State et al
as 3:2017cv01374
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bey
Defendant:
US Department of State, Karen Pizza and Celeste F
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daniels-Bey v. Astfalk et al
as 2:2015mc51221
Petitioner:
Martha Daniels-Bey
Respondent:
Christopher Astfalk and Mark E. Plaza
Daniels-Bey v. Parrott et al
as 2:2015mc51219
Petitioner:
Martha Daniels-Bey
Respondent:
David M. Parrott and Alan Hindsman
Daniels Bey et al v. Youngblood et al
as 2:2014mc51041
Plaintiff:
Martha Daniels Bey and Melkiyah El
Defendant:
Bernard Youngblood and Cathy Garrett
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
