Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kevin Quillinan v. Russell Ainsworth, et al
as 18-16197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN DANIEL QUILLINAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RUSSELL AINSWORTH, DANIEL BORNSTEIN, DANIEL CHEUNG and others
Kevin Quillinan v. Russell Ainsworth, et al
as 18-16163
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KEVIN DANIEL QUILLINAN
Defendant - Appellant:
RUSSELL AINSWORTH, DANIEL BORNSTEIN, DANIEL CHEUNG and others
MESADIEU v. CITY OF ELIZABETH et al
as 2:2018cv00842
Plaintiff:
GUILIO MESADIEU
Defendant:
CITY OF ELIZABETH, ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNION COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Quillinan v. Russell Ainsworth, et al
as 17-17375
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KEVIN DANIEL QUILLINAN
Defendant - Appellant:
RUSSELL AINSWORTH, DANIEL BORNSTEIN, DANIEL CHEUNG and others
Kevin Quillinan v. Russell Ainsworth, et al
as 17-17276
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN DANIEL QUILLINAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RUSSELL AINSWORTH, DANIEL BORNSTEIN, ABIGAIL BORNSTEIN and others
Quillinan v. Ainsworth et al
as 4:2017cv00077
Defendant:
Ainsworth, Wes-Co Industries, Z-Square Properties Company and others
Plaintiff:
Quillinan and Kevin Daniel Quillinan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Major v. City and County of San Francisco
as 4:2015cv03426
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Major
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Barbara Garcia, Gregory Suhr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Mercy Housing California et al
as 3:2012cv00234
Plaintiff:
Larry Richards
Defendant:
Mercy Housing California, Mercy Housing X, Mercy Services Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv04743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
PRATOLA v. BORNSTEIN et al
as 2:2011cv05000
Plaintiff:
DONALD J. PRATOLA
Defendant:
DANIEL BORNSTEIN, PAULA DOW, ALL JOHN & JANE DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
