Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Beardsley et al v. County of Saratoga
as 1:2023cv01641
Plaintiff:
Brendan Beardsley, Nicole Hollner, Susan Traver and others
Defendant:
County of Saratoga
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DUNN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24968
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DUNN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rockwell Financial Group et al v. Bird
as 1:2023cv05704
Petitioner:
Hugh Daniel Dunn, Michael John Halkitis and The Rockwell Financial Group, Inc.
Respondent:
Mark Bird
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
DOE v. DUNN et al
as 2:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
John K.A. Doe
Defendant:
Daniel Dunn, THE UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS, KATHRYN DONOVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Turner v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv00704
Defendant:
Bryan Vielman, Curtis Weathersby, Andrew Khalifeh and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2020cv01248
Plaintiff:
Alisha Danielle Dunn
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DUNNE v. SANOFI US SERVICES INC. et al
as 9:2020cv80494
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DUNNE
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc., SANOFI AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
DUNNE v. SANOFI US SERVICES INC. et al
as 3:2020cv01645
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DUNNE
Defendant:
SANOFI US SERVICES INC., SANOFI AVENTIS U.S. LLC, CHATTEN, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
