Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Edwin Ryan, Jr. et al v. Chino Valley Independent Fire District
as 5:2019cv01490
Plaintiff:
Keith Stroup, Rick Parpan, Leslie Kast and others
Defendant:
Chino Valley Independent Fire District
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Daniel Fry
as 15-3062
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Daniel Fry
O'Neal v. Bonham C-P-D-J-E, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
Stephenie O'Neal
Defendant:
Bonham C-P-D-J-E, Inc., Daniels & Fry Motor Co., Inc. and Eugene Knies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jerry Moore, Sr. v. Wesbanco Bank, Inc., et al
as 13-4477
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY E. MOORE, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WESBANCO BANK, INC., DANIEL FRY and JANE/JOHN DOE
Lee Parrish, et al v. City of Mason, et al
as 13-3435
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LEE PARRISH, Administrator of the estate on behalf of Douglas Boucher, ERNEST BOUCHER, CHERYL BOUCHER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF MASON, DANIEL FRY and SEAN MCCORMICK, Individually and in their official capacities as employees of the City of Mason
Jerry Moore, Sr. v. Wesbanco Bank, Inc., et al
as 12-3697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY E. MOORE, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WESBANCO BANK, INC. and DANIEL FRY
Defendant:
JANE/JOHN DOE
Parrish et al v. City of Mason, Ohio et al
as 1:2011cv00861
Plaintiff:
Lee Parrish , Ernest Boucher , Cheryl Boucher and others
Defendant:
Mason City of, Daniel Fry and Sean McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00673
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Moore v. Wesbanco Bank, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00514
Defendant:
Wesbanco Bank, Inc., Daniel Fry and Jane/John Doe
Plaintiff:
Jerry E. Moore, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.