Cases 1 - 10 of 16
NUNEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15488
Plaintiff:
DANIEL NUNEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CALDERON v. LINDENMUTH et al
as 3:2022cv02305
Plaintiff:
DANIEL NUNEZ CALDERON
Defendant:
RONNIE L. LINDENMUTH, ABC CORP. 1-10, JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Curtis Baker v. City of Madison, Alabama, et al
as 22-10732
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS BAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MADISON, ALABAMA, DANIEL NUNEZ and DION HOSE
Nicole Cavicante et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv06676
Plaintiff:
NICOLE CAVICANTE, individually and as Successor in Interest to RANDY MILLER, deceased, JEREMY CAVICANTE, individually and as Successor in Interest to RANDY MILLER, deceased, Nicole Cavicante and others
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, OFFICER DANIEL NUNEZ, OFFICER ANTONIO VALASCO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. City of Madison, Alabama et al
as 5:2021cv00382
Defendant:
Dion Hose, City of Madison, Alabama and Daniel Nunez
Plaintiff:
Curtis Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Nunez
as 20-40812
Defendant / Appellant:
Daniel Nunez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
NUNEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv05119
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL NUNEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Daniel Nunez
as 17-50071
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL NUNEZ
Quiller v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv03202
Plaintiff:
Fletcher Quiller
Defendant:
City Of New York, Daniel Nunez, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banner et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 1:2016cv02781
Plaintiff:
William Banner , Roland Bartley , Samantha Bechel and others
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
