Cases 41 - 50 of 727
Melbrough Williams v. Daniel Paramo
as 20-55542
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
MELBROUGH WILLIAMS
William Dawes v. The People of the State, et al
as 20-55501
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Warden at Richard J. Donovan, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, Executive Branch of the County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM DAWES
Raul Arellano v. K. Dean, et al
as 20-55505
Defendant / Appellee:
K. DEAN, Dr., M. GLYNN, Deputy Director at California Correctional Health Care Services, S. ROBERTS, M.D., Chief Medical Executive and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Warden
Devon v. Diaz et al
as 3:2020cv00842
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, Daniel Paramo and Ralph M. Diaz
Plaintiff:
Alan Devon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
David Gazcon, Jr. v. Daniel Paramo
as 20-55485
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID GAZCON, Jr.
Craig Garrett v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 20-55367
Defendant / Appellee:
OROZCO, SIGALA, Prison Guard, PATRICK COVELLO, Warden (A) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG KAISER GARRETT
Jones v. CDCR Warden, Salinas Valley State Prison et al
as 4:2020cv02268
Defendant:
Dr. Bick, Correctional Officer Lozano, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walker Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
St. Sauver v. Byrd-Hunt et al
as 3:2020cv00584
Plaintiff:
Kenneth St. Sauver
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo and Byrd-Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Allen Hammler v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 20-55307
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVAREZ, C/O, P. CORTEZ, Cor. Counselor (CC2), DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Warden of RJD/SP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLEN HAMMLER
Bradford v. Paramo
as 3:2020cv00278
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
