Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Sandefur v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Darren Ray Sandefur
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections and Daniel Redington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fede v. Redington et al
as 2:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
George Fede
Defendant:
Daniel Redington, Chantay Godert, COI Unknown Cecil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redington v. Jupiter Networks (US), Inc.
as 4:2023cv00707
Plaintiff:
Daniel Redington
Defendant:
Jupiter Networks, Inc. and Juniper Networks (US), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 601 Age Discrimination in Employment Act
Buckner v. Shaffer et al
as 2:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Earnest L. Buckner
Defendant:
A. Shaffer, M. Golain, D. Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Redington
as 2:2023cv00003
Petitioner:
Wilbert W. Robinson
Respondent:
Daniel Redington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boure v. Redington et al
as 2:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Boure
Defendant:
Daniel Redington, Lacey Twellman, Rebecca Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Redington
as 2:2022cv00055
Petitioner:
Timothy Jacobs
Respondent:
Daniel Redington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Redington et al
as 2:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Samuel Taylor
Defendant:
Daniel Redington, Ashley Meyer, Barbei Finley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McAllister v. Redington
as 2:2022cv00002
Petitioner:
Eugene McAllister
Respondent:
Daniel Redington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McAllister v. Redington
as 4:2022cv00074
Petitioner:
Eugene McAllister
Respondent:
Daniel Redington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
