Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Emrit v. National Football League et al
as 6:2020cv00024
Defendant:
Washington Redskins, Daniel Snyder, National Football League
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bonivert v. Clarkston, City of et al
as 2:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Ryan J Bonivert
Defendant:
Clarkston, City of , County of Asotin, Washington , Daniel Combs
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Teresa Stephens v. United States et al
as 2:2012mc00254
Respondent:
Jann Wenner, Wenner Media LLC, Wenner Productions, LLC
and others
Petitioner:
Teresa L Stephens
FBI:
Federal Bureau of Investigations
CIA:
Central Intelligence Agency
DOD:
Department of Defense
Dydzak v. United States of America et al
as 4:2017cv04360
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dydzak
Defendant:
United States of America, Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, Matthew C. Rogers
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02546
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Daniel Dydzak v. USA, et al
as 17-17401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, MATTHEW C. ROGERS, AKA Matt Rogers
and others
Daniel Dydzak v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye, et al
as 12-56960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, JOYCE L. KENNARD, MARVIN R. BAXTER
and others
Daniel Dydzak v. USA, et al
as 18-15673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, MATTHEW C. ROGERS, AKA Matt Rogers
and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
