Cases 1 - 10 of 11
(HC) Dixon v. Lozano
as 2:2020cv00604
Respondent:
Jared R. Lozano
Petitioner:
Daniel Steve Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dixon v. Lewis et al.
as 1:2016cv00989
Plaintiff:
Daniel Steve Dixon
Defendant:
J. Lewis, J. St. Clair, R. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Lewis et al.
as 2:2016cv01481
Plaintiff:
Daniel Steve Dixon
Defendant:
J. Lewis, J. St. Clair, R. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Beard et al
as 1:2016cv00133
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, John Clark Kelso , Kelly Harrington and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Steve Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Dixon v. J. O'Connor, et al
as 12-15825
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL STEVE DIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. S. O'CONNOR, Correctional Officer, ALTHEA COSTALES, Prison Industry Authority Superintendent, APRIL L. ANDERSON, Prison Industry Authority Administrator and others
Daniel Dixon v. USDC-CASAC
as 11-70397
:
In re: DANIEL STEVE DIXON
Petitioner:
DANIEL STEVE DIXON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
ALTHEA COSTALES, APRIL J. ANDERSON, Prison Industry Authority, WILLIAM KNIPP, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Daniel Dixon v. USDC Sacramento
as 10-72688
:
In re: DANIEL STEVE DIXON
Petitioner:
DANIEL STEVE DIXON
Respondent:
USDC, SACRAMENTO and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
J. S. O'CONNOR, ALTHEA COSTALES, APRIL L. ANDERSON and others
Dixon v. LaRosa, et al
as 2:2010cv01441
Plaintiff:
Daniel Steve Dixon
Defendant:
S. LaRosa, D Grzebyk, - Crosby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Dixon v. USDCSAC
as 10-70711
:
In re: DANIEL STEVE DIXON
Petitioner:
DANIEL STEVE DIXON
Respondent:
USDC, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
J. S. O'CONNOR, ALTHEA COSTALES, APRIL L. ANDERSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
