Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Jones v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02950
Plaintiff:
Eugene Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02946
Plaintiff:
Betty Jones and Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hutzler et al v. Nuclear Security, LLC (TV1)
as 3:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hutzler, Chad Acres, Chelsea Adkisson and others
Defendant:
Consolidated Nuclear Security, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones v. The Ball Gentlemen's Club Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00324
Defendant:
Club Ball doing business as The Ball Gentleman's Club, The Ball Gentlemen's Club Inc. and John Nichols
Plaintiff:
Danielle Jones
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jones et al v. Americore Health, LLC et al
as 6:2019cv00282
Plaintiff:
Paula Downey and Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Pineville Medical Center, LLC, Americore Health, LLC and Grant White
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Harvell et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11307
Plaintiff:
Sam Scarpello, Kelli Olson, Ross Mulcahy and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Jones v. Balcarcel
as 2:2018cv12003
Respondent:
Mark McCullick and Erick Balcarcel
Petitioner:
Cordell Daniel Jones
Jones v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00519
Defendant:
First National Collection Bureau, Inc. and Pinnacle Credit Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jones v. Lubrizol Corporation
as 1:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Lubrizol Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Derrick Braden v. Derrick Schofield, et al
as 17-5172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK RANARD BRADEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, Tennessee Department of Correction Commissioner, DOUG COOK, Warden, SGT. JOHNSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
