Cases 1 - 10 of 18,066
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayborne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Maehren et al v. City of Kirkland et al
as 2:2024cv00532
Petitioner:
Daniel and Angela Maehren, Ray and Susan Carr and Ariji Ganguly
Respondent:
City of Kirkland, 12708 NE 7th LLC, Adam Weinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Asimba v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Maureen Achieng Asimba
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Ted H Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Grant v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03141
Plaintiff:
Daniel Grant
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Daniels v. Arnold, et al.
as 24-2365
Plaintiff:
TED DARNELL DANIELS
Defendant:
ERIC ARNOLD, MARIANNA LOTERSZTAIN, M. DE LA VEGA and others
Mulcahey v. Principal Life Insurance Company et al
as 5:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mulcahey
Defendant:
Principal Life Insurance Company and Healthcare Management Solutions Llc Group Life Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
