Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hines v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02692
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darling v. Sunbeam Products, Inc.
as 0:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
Annette Darling
Defendant:
Sunbeam Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Hines v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv00604
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darling v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv01161
Plaintiff:
Paul Thomas Darling
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Ugorets et al v. City of Shorewood et al
as 0:2021cv01446
Plaintiff:
Alex Ugorets and Elena Ugorets
Defendant:
Nathaniel Gorhan, City of Shorewood, Greg Lerud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hageman v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2020cv02257
Defendant:
CPD Quist, CPD Scott, Safety Director Karels and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Hageman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cowen et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02185
Plaintiff:
William Curtis, II, Kurt Everett Darby, Jack Duncan and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo, LLC, Aearo Holdings, LLC and others
Munt v. Roy et al
as 0:2019cv00056
Defendant:
Other OPH Mailroom Staff, Jeanne Michels, Eddie Miles and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Marvin Munt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schaaff v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2015cv02997
Plaintiff:
Darl D. Schaaff
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meade v. Darling et al
as 0:2013cv02272
Plaintiff:
Teresa A. Meade
Defendant:
Alvin Fay Darling and Featherlite, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
