Cases 1 - 9 of 9
IJL Midwest Milwaukee, LLC et al v. It's Just Lunch International, LLC
as 2:2019cv01006
Plaintiff:
Sara Darling and IJL Midwest Milwaukee, LLC
Defendant:
It's Just Lunch International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: ADMISSION OF GOVENMENT ATTORNEYS
as 3:2017ms00037
In Re:
Jason Blumberg, Antonia G. Darling, Edmund Gee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00557
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Darling v. Rex
as 2:2016cv02897
Plaintiff:
Emily Darling and Gregory Darling
Defendant:
Samuel Rex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Darling v. Rex
as 2:2016cv02323
Plaintiff:
Emily Darling
Defendant:
Samuel Rex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Yepes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2016cv02240
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Darling Jennifer Michae Yepes
Unknown:
Ronald A. Colquitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Trustees of the Teamsters Local 631 Security Fund for Southern Nevada v. Darling International, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00377
Defendant:
Darling International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Teamsters Local 631 Security Fund for Southern Nevada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trapp v. Big Poppa's, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00995
Plaintiff:
Theodore Trapp, Theodore Trapp and Theodore Trapp
Defendant:
Big Poppa's, LLC, Sky Top Vending, Inc., La Fuente, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
