Cases 11 - 20 of 237
Cushenberry v. Hooper
as 22-30156
Petitioner / Appellant:
Leonardo Cushenberry
Respondent / Appellee:
Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Savage v. LeBlanc
as 22-30125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Gregory Savage
Defendant / Appellant:
James M. LeBlanc, Secretary, Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, in his individual capacity, Joseph Lamartiniere, Deputy Warden, in his individual capacity and others
Morning v. Hooper
as 22-30141
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ahmed R. Morning
Respondent / Appellee:
Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Donald Loston v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 18-30988
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD LOSTON
Respondent - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Harold Bunch v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 18-30964
Petitioner - Appellant:
HAROLD J. BUNCH
Respondent - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Aaron Francois v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 18-30956
Petitioner - Appellant:
AARON FRANCOIS
Respondent - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Allen Martin v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 18-30915
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALLEN MARTIN
Respondent - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Terence Pollard v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 18-30911
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERENCE L. POLLARD
Respondent - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Roy Jones v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 18-30909
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROY J. JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Everett Wills, II v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 18-30895
Petitioner - Appellant:
EVERETT CHARLES WILLS, II, also known as Everett Charles Wills, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
