Cases 1 - 10 of 22
USA v. Darryl King
as 24-10104
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DARRYL KING
Young et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 2:2023cv04868
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Rory Young, Ashley Palmer, Chris Plummer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Young et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 1:2023cv07160
Plaintiff:
Rory Young, Ashley Palmer, Chris Plummer and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Young et al v. R & A Oyster Company, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Young and Darryl King
Defendant:
R & A Oyster Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
KING v. USA
as 4:2014cv00029
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DARRYL KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv08587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Korell Battle v. Darryl King
as 13-7579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KORELL BATTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
DARRYL KING, JAN PITTMAN and SCDC
King v. Bexar County Adult Detention Center et al
as 5:2013cv00749
Defendant:
Bexar County Adult Detention Center and Bexar County Sheriff Susan Pamerleau
Plaintiff:
Darryl King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. King et al
as 2:2012cv02476
Plaintiff:
Korell Battle
Defendant:
Darryl King, Jan Pittman and SCDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Ozmint et al
as 2:2012cv01350
Plaintiff:
Korell Battle
Defendant:
John Ozmint, Fredrick Thompson, D Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
