Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Rogers v. Dart Transit Company et al
as 4:2021cv00076
Defendant:
Corporate Medical Services, Inc., Dart Transit Company and Omega Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Busch-Harrison v. Dart Transit Company
as 0:2021cv00119
Plaintiff:
Angela Busch-Harrison
Defendant:
Dart Transit Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
MCDONALD v. ROLLINS et al
as 1:2020cv02483
Plaintiff:
ELMER McDONALD
Defendant:
DART TRANSIT COMPANY, KEVIN E ROLLINS and KEVIN E. ROLLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henderson et al v. Deamontray Warren et al
as 3:2020cv00568
Plaintiff:
Henderson, Johnny, Childs, Tramaine, Johnny Henderson and others
Defendant:
Warren, Deamontray, Dart Transit Company and Deamontray Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ali et al v. Dart Transit Company et al
as 1:2020cv02862
Plaintiff:
Asiya Baksh Ali and Mohammad Farid
Defendant:
Ruth Dettenheim and Dart Transit Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pack v. Lee et al
as 0:2019cv02248
Defendant:
Norris Ortavious Lee and Dart Transit Company
Plaintiff:
Valerie Pack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bourgeois et al v. Dart Transit Co et al
as 2:2019cv01031
Defendant:
Michael Scott Carson, Dart Transit Company and Dart Transit Co
Plaintiff:
Siv Bourgeois and Eric J Bourgeois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Byars v. Dart Transit Company et al
as 3:2019cv00541
Defendant:
Does 1-100, Dart Transit Company and Mainstream Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Byars
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Paul Cline, et al v. Dart Transit Company, et al
as 19-3375
Defendant / Appellee:
DART TRANSIT COMPANY and SUSAN PRIEST RICHLAK, Administrator of the Estate of Richard M. Thompson, Jr., deceased
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL CLINE and JEANINE CLINE
Haven v. Dart Transit Company
as 3:2019cv00024
Plaintiff:
Leslie Haven
Defendant:
Dart Transit Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
