Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Rogers v. Jennings et al
as 5:2025cv00109
Plaintiff:
Delbert Glenn Rogers
Defendant:
Shirmar Jennings, Rebecca Lang and David Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. McLane et al
as 1:2025cv00337
Plaintiff:
Andre Johnson
Defendant:
Marsha McLane, Management Training and Corporation and David Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2025cv00713
Plaintiff:
David Bowers and Leslie Bowers
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
San Miguel v. Searcy et al
as 5:2025cv00033
Plaintiff:
Samuel San Miguel
Defendant:
Michael Searcy, Marsha McLane, Kara Gougler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Bowers et al
as 5:2025cv00015
Plaintiff:
Victor Jackson
Defendant:
David Bowers, FNU Jefferson, FNU Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowers v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv04677
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Rogers v. Bowers et al
as 5:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Delbert G. Rogers
Defendant:
Marsha McLane and David Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Bower v. Loandepot, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
David Bower
Defendant:
LOANDEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Daroya Isaiah v. loanDepot, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Daroya Isaiah, Jonathan Rosas, Joel Eggleton and others
Defendant:
loanDepot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Bowers v. Officer Taylor
as 1:2023cv02387
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel-David Bowers
Defendant:
Officer Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
