Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Carone v. The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company et al
as 2:2024cv04180
Plaintiff:
Gary Thomas Carone
Defendant:
Nancy G Mistretta, Gerald Volas, David C Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Rodriguez v. Hagedorn et al
as 2:2024cv03880
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
DAVID C EVANS, JAMES HAGEDORN, ADAM HANFT and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Ayers v. Hagedorn et al
as 1:2024cv00402
Defendant:
Brian E Sandoval, Edith Aviles, James Hagedorn and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ayers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
City of Inkster Policemen and Firemen Retirement System v. Scotts Miracle-Gro Company et al
as 2:2024cv03766
Defendant:
Matthew E. Garth, David C Evans, Christopher J. Hagedorn and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF INKSTER POLICEMEN AND FIREMEN RETIREMENT SYSTEM and Stanley J. Marks
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Scott v. The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company et al
as 2:2024cv03636
Defendant:
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, Nancy G. Mistretta, Christopher J. Hagedorn and others
Plaintiff:
Rachel Scott
Interested Party:
Anthony Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Strohl et al v. Combs
as 2:2015cv00567
Plaintiff:
Myles Strohl , Eric Strohl , Jacqueline Strohl and others
Defendant:
Arthur Combs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Cason, et al v. Seckinger, et al
as 5:1984cv00313
Plaintiff:
Buddy Cason , Vikki Contreras , Patricia Lequeux and others
Defendant:
Jim Seckinger , Thomas C. Jones, Jr. , Elie Jones and others
Consol_defendant:
Bobby K. Whitworth , Calvin Green , Thomas C. Jones, Jr. and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Deown P. Washington and Gerald Wendell Spivey
Movant:
Donald Dempsey, Albert Thomas and Sharon Bush Ellison
Amicu:
Donald Dempsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
